Archive for April 22nd, 2009

YouTube will lose $470 million in 2009 – even more than the New York Times

picture-5

If you think Google is infallible–and frankly, very often they seem to be–take a moment to consider the hemorrhaging going on at one of its most high-profile investments, YouTube. Farhad Manjoo writes in Slate that analysts at Credit Suisse estimate that YouTube will lose $470 million this year. This would be considered a horrific number even in the newspaper business. (Still chump change if you’re running a car company or a bank, of course.) What’s more, monetizing some of the most popular content on YouTube is problematic, because a significant amount of it is pirated. And the creators of the content–often TV networks–are unlikely to agree that YouTube deserves advertising revenue generated by their content. Can’t say that I blame them. 

The only good news for Google is that they’re sitting on a pile of hundred-dollar bills roughly the size of the Great Pyramid at Giza, which means they will have more time to work on a solution that most other companies would. That being said, Google is caught in a trap of their own devising, and a lot of very smart people don’t see a good way out of it. If they can’t stop the bleeding, Larry and Sergey may even have to downgrade to a 767 and/or cut back on the Alaskan king crab legs in the employee cafeteria. And a pity that would be.

Add comment April 22, 2009


Blogroll

Archives

Feeds

 

Recent Posts

Tags

advertising Apple brands Cannes China Chris Anderson digital e-commerce economics economy electronic media entertainment facebook free gaming Google interactive internet iPhone iPod Kindle Mark Cuban marketing Mark Zuckerberg media mobile Neil Postman New York Times Obama online political advertising psychology recession ROI sex social networking Steve Jobs strategy subservient chicken technology television Twitter viral Yahoo YouTube